16, 2026
Anime

Michelin-Starred Seoul Restaurant Hit With Heavy Fines Over Illegal Ant Dessert Garnish

A prestigious two Michelin-starred dining establishment located in the South Korean capital of Seoul has been ordered to pay substantial fines after regulatory authorities discover

Rizky Amelia
Rizky Amelia Reporter

Diterbitkan:

0 komentar 0 dibaca

Michelin-Starred Seoul Restaurant Hit With Heavy Fines Over Illegal Ant Dessert Garnish

A prestigious two Michelin-starred dining establishment located in the South Korean capital of Seoul has been ordered to pay substantial fines after regulatory authorities discovered that it had been routinely garnishing its dessert courses with black ants.

The legal judgment issued financial penalties against both the individual proprietor and the operating corporate body behind the celebrated venue, Evett. According to domestic media reports, the restaurant owner was issued a fine of 15 million won (equivalent to roughly £8,144 or $10,965), while the corporate entity that manages the establishment received a separate fine of 10 million won for direct infractions of South Korea's Food Sanitation Act.

The East Asian nation maintains highly specific, rigorous regulatory standards governing which insect species may be legally prepared and served for human consumption. Under existing statutory frameworks, South Korean food authorities permit only 10 specific insect varieties, an authorized roster that includes locusts, grasshoppers, and certain types of silkworms. Ants of any species are not included on this legally recognized list.

During the legal proceedings, state prosecutors took a severe stance regarding the regulatory breaches, pushing for a one-year prison sentence for the owner alongside a higher financial sanction of 20 million won.

However, the presiding judge chose not to impose a custodial sentence, taking several mitigating circumstances into account during sentencing. The court highlighted that the restaurant owner had admitted to the charges and possessed no prior criminal record, factors that weighed in favor of leniency regarding incarceration.

Despite the mitigation, the judge delivered stern remarks concerning the potential health hazards associated with the unapproved ingredients. The court emphasized that the defendant's culpability could not be viewed lightly, pointing out that official laboratory testing of the ants had detected the presence of heavy metals exceeding established national safety thresholds.

The unauthorized culinary practice first came to the attention of government regulators through an investigation conducted by South Korea's Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Officials uncovered the illicit ingredient usage after monitoring and reviewing public online feedback and photographs posted by patrons who had dined at the restaurant.

Detailed findings from the food safety ministry indicated that the restaurant had systematically incorporated the insects over an extended period. The owner was found to have applied three to five ants atop specific dessert dishes to introduce a distinctive sour flavor profile, a practice maintained across nearly four years of operation.

Over the course of this multi-year timeframe, regulatory officials calculated that approximately 49,000 individual ants had been utilized as toppings on the restaurant's specialty sorbet creations.

Official inquiries into the restaurant's supply lines revealed that the insects were obtained across international borders rather than from local domestic suppliers. The Ministry of Food and Drug Safety confirmed that the vast majority of the ants had been imported from the United States, while a smaller portion was brought into the country from Thailand.

In presenting a defense, the proprietor argued that the insect topping represented only an extremely minor element within the restaurant's broader 15-course tasting menu. The defense also maintained that front-of-house staff routinely informed diners about the inclusion of the ants and gave customers the option to select an alternative, insect-free topping if they preferred not to eat them.

The restaurateur further claimed to have been entirely unaware that offering ants in food preparations was outlawed under South Korean legislation, noting that such insects are widely accepted and utilized as edible ingredients in culinary traditions outside the country.

Indeed, various insect species, including ants, are recognized and consumed in multiple gastronomic cultures throughout parts of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In countries such as Thailand and Cambodia, weaver ants and their eggs are traditionally featured in regional cooking, while in Colombia, queen ants are highly prized and treated as a culinary delicacy on par with luxury caviar.

The punitive ruling marks an unusual regulatory controversy for an establishment operating at the peak of international gastronomic prestige. Under the standards of the Michelin Guide, a two-star rating is awarded to venues providing "excellent cooking" and represents a destination that is deemed "worth a detour" for culinary enthusiasts.

The court's decision underscores the strict boundary lines established by South Korean food safety regulators, signaling that even high-profile, internationally recognized culinary ventures must strictly adhere to statutory hygiene codes and approved ingredient frameworks.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PENULIS Rizky Amelia

Reporter Senior. Meliput dinamika politik nasional, kebijakan publik, dan isu parlemen selama 8 tahun. Alumni FISIP UI.

 (0)

User

24 jam